AWA
Up 9 CFR

 

 

The Animal Welfare Act

Last updated on 01/30/02

1. Laboratory Animal Welfare Act of 1966 (Public Law 89-544)
2. Animal Welfare Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-579)
3. 1976 Amendments to the Animal Welfare Act (Public Law 94-279)
4. Food Security Act of 1985 (Public Law 99-198), Subtitle F (Improved Standards for Laboratory Animals)
5. Food and Agriculture Conservation and Trade Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-624), Section 2503, Protection of Pets

These laws contain provisions to prevent the sale or use of animals that have been stolen, prohibit animal fighting ventures, and ensure that animals used in testing, teaching or research, for exhibition or as pets receive humane care and treatment. Regulatory authority is given to the secretary of the USDA and is implemented by APHIS. The rules and regulations are published in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 9 (Animals and Animal Products), Chapter 1, Subchapter A (Animal Welfare){3948}, which is commonly referred to as just "9 CFR". Within 9 CFR, Part 2 contains the regulations for registration, the IACUC, personnel qualifications, the attending veterinarian, record keeping, and the annual report.  Part 3 contains the standards for the facility and its operation and for the care and transportation of animals. The different sub-parts are in the process of being updated: sub-part A (dogs, cats and NHPs) was updated in 1991, sub-parts B (guinea pigs and hamsters) and C (rabbits) were completed in 1989, and sub-parts E (marine mammals), F (other animals) and G (farm animals) are still underway.{4099}

The original AWA in 1966 applied to dealers of dogs and cats, and to biomedical users. Once dealers were licensed or biomedical users registered, however, there were regulations to follow for the care of hamsters, rabbits, guinea pigs and NHPs. In biomedical organizations the law applied only to animals prior to or after actual research or testing, not during these activities{3947}.

The 1970 amendments added any warm-blooded animals designated by the Secretary of Agriculture to the list of regulated species. The term "dealer" was broadened to incorporate those who sold any regulated animal for research, teaching, exhibition, or use as a pet at the wholesale level; retail pet stores were excluded. Zoos were added and required to be licensed. The standards for animal care were extended to cover their entire stay in the facility, and the facility had to show annually that professionally acceptable standards were being followed. Use of anesthetic, analgesic and tranquilizing drugs had to be used under these regulations, if appropriate{3947}.

The 1976 amendments added common carriers (airlines) under the coverage of the AWA. Containers and conditions of shipment were regulated. Interstate promotion or shipment of animals for fighting ventures were outlawed{3947}. 

Requirements for exercising dogs and providing psychological well-being services for NHPs were mandated by the 1985 amendment.{4099}

The 1990 amendment expanded the AWA to protect pets. Humane societies, pounds and research facilities have to hold each dog or cat for at least 5 days to allow the owners time to claim it before selling the dog or cat to a dealer. A dealer must provide valid certification with each random source dog or cat that includes:

name, address, USDA license or registration number if it exists, and signature of the recipient
a description of the animal (species or breed, sex, date of birth, color or distinctive markings)
name of the entity they got the animal from with an assurance that the previous entity knew the animal was being procured for research or education
date of purchase or acquisition
a statement by the pound or shelter that it satisfied these requirements

This certification must be kept for at least a year by both the dealer and the research facility. If a dealer violates this law more than once, they are subject to a fine of $5000 per dog or cat; if they violate it three or more times their license will be revoked. 

This information is at http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/legislat/pl101624.htm

In September 2000 the USDA settled out of court with the Alternatives Research and Development Foundation (ARDF) and agreed to include rats, mice and birds under the definition of "animal." However, Congress prohibited USDA from issuing a final rule until after FY 2002.{4510}

APHIS is still considering the final policy on provision for the psychological well-being of NHPs, following publication of the draft version in July 1999.{4510}

Top

©1999, Janet Becker Rodgers, DVM, MS, DipACLAM, MRCVS

All rights reserved.

Comments? Send an email to janet.rodgers@vet.ox.ac.uk